Fehr factor: One strike away again?
Pesky holds the ball ... Denny Galehouse ... Aparicio falls rounding
third ... Ed Armbrister and Jim Burton ... Bucky Dent ... Bill Buckner ...
And now in the spectacular season of 2002 ... Donald Fehr.
Fast-forward to Oct. 1. The Red Sox have just won a major league-record
117 games. They've got Pedro Martinez, Derek Lowe, John Burkett, and
Darren Oliver - all 20-game winners - lined up for the first round of the
playoffs. On the heels of a Super Bowl crown and an NBA title, Boston is
braced for the end of its long baseball championship drought.
And then it turns out the only thing we have to Fear is Fehr himself:
The Players Association goes on strike, wiping out the World Series for
the second time in nine seasons.
And the Red Sox find yet another ghoulish way to deny New England its
hardball crown. A new twist on an old plot. A new way to lose. A new
meaning to the old Jimmy Piersall biography: Fehr Strikes Out.
The doomsday scenario has been kicking around New England for the last
couple of days since it was learned that major league players were
discussing possible strike dates. Some cynical Sox souls feel Messrs. Fehr
and Selig could be the Armbrister and Burton of the new century.
Any baseball strike is a deadly, depressing development, but this is
New England, where it's always about us and it's easy to see ourselves as
the ultimate victims if there should be a strike in this (thus far) most
magical of seasons.
It would not be the first time a labor issue came back to bite Red Sox
Nation. In 1972 - the year the Sox finished one-half game behind
the Detroit Tigers in the American League East, the Sox suffered because
they played one fewer game than the Tigers. It was an aftereffect of a
10-day strike at the start of the season. The Sox lost seven games to the
strike, the Tigers only six. As a result, the Sox finished out of the
running, even though they had the same number of losses as the Tigers.
The Cincinnati Reds were cheated worse as a result of the lengthy
midseason strike of 1981. A goofy postseason was established honoring
winners of each half of the split season. In the National League
West, the Dodgers won the first half, the Astros won the second half, but
the Reds won three more games than either team, yet didn't make the
playoffs.
The soon-to-be-contracted Montreal Expos were derailed by the strike of
1994. In what was undoubtedly the franchise's best chance to win a World
Series, the Expos were a baseball-best 74-40 (.649) when the fellas packed
their stuff and went home in August.
Now it could be the Red Sox' turn to cry again.
Red Sox CEO Larry Lucchino thinks there has been an overreaction to the
sabre-rattling that came out of New York earlier this week.
''Chill out,'' said Lucchino. ''There are big issues to be resolved,
but let's not overreact to every little nuance of conversation. I don't
want to overreact to one reporter's interpretation of some very general
remarks by a Players Association leader. And I think that is what has
happened.''
OK, Larry. But what if the Sox did run the table, then were denied a
chance to shine in October?
''I think our fans would feel a pretty acute sense of deprivation, to
put it mildly,'' he acknowledged. ''So we're not even going to allow
ourselves to think in those terms. There's a danger that too much
speculating can cause problems.''
We can only hope he's right. But one agent who was at Fehr's conclave
in New York earlier this week believes there is a very grave danger of a
work stoppage this season.
Fehr simply doesn't trust the commissioner. And the commissioner is
tired of having his head handed to him by the still-undefeated Players
Association.
There are never winners in these things. But rarely have the Sox had
more at stake. New England is dizzy about this (thus far) magical team.
The annual feeling that this is the year feels somewhat valid.
And now there's the threat of a strike starting Oct. 1, the first day of
the playoffs.
Needless worry? Perhaps. Overreaction? Maybe. But these are the Red
Sox, and it's always something with the hometown team.
This time, they could fall victim to Fehr and loathing on the campaign
trail.
By Dan Shaughnessy of The Boston Globe Staff
This story ran on page D1 of the Boston Globe on
5/17/2002.
Copyright
2002 Globe Newspaper Company.